Some people in the mobile market are touting femtocell offerings like Sprint’s Airave or T-Mobile’s @home as the newest technology that will revolutionize the mobile market, allowing people to drop their land lines and solely use mobile devices moving forward. While they do offer some advantages, femtocells have far from proven themselves and have some significant issues for users to consider:
• Femtocells are effective only in the home or building where they are installed, and they lock users into a monthly broadband subscription fee. They are not able to boost cellular coverage in a mobile environment.
• Signal improvement is generally limited to a set number of phones previously programmed into the femtocell during set-up.
• Femtocells, like the Airave and @home, are carrier specific and won’t boost signals for multiple individuals with differing carrier subscriptions.
• Perhaps most notably, femtocells require a high-speed Internet connection, something currently unavailable in many areas of the U.S.
Unlike femtocells, cellular amplifiers are not tied to a broadband connection. This eliminates additional monthly fees and provides help to those without access to broadband service. Amplifiers from Wilson Electronics boost all incoming and outgoing cellular signals within their frequency range, greatly reducing dead zones and dropped calls. It is important to note that Wilson cellular signal amplifiers in particular are type-accepted by the FCC and are available in a wide variety of wireless and direct-connection models.
The benefits of an enhanced cellular signal amplifier have encouraged many consumers to look into any and all technology that promises extended and enhanced signal reach. When evaluating technology, especially femotcells, pay attention to the details and limitations it may have. If looking for a mobile, accessible cell signal booster, you might want to consider a cellular signal amplifier instead.
Contributor - Walt Brooks, Wilson Electronics
Monday, September 29, 2008
Femtocells Do Have Limitations
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Archive
-
►
2010
(53)
-
►
March
(16)
- Cell Phone Sales Tips
- iPhone Battery Life is AT&T's Biggest Problem
- How to Complain About Cell Phone Service
- Wifi Cell Phone Towers are the Future
- FCC Violates Our Trademark
- Big Money Trying to Squash Cell Phone Boosters
- How to Relieve 3G Network Congestion
- Cox Wireless Service Ads Miss The Mark
- AT&T Customers Will Soon Be Happy
- Femtocells & Wifi - Can't They Just Get Along?
- Apple iPad Make Way for the dPad Tablet
- Man Dumps Cell Phone for Telegraph After Too Many ...
- Can You Hear Me Now?
- Are You A Sucker for Marketing Scams?
- False Advertising of Service Availability
- Mobile Video 66% of Data Traffic by 2014
-
►
February
(34)
- Wireless Operator Internal Corporate Conflicts
- Wireless Product of the Year Candidate MobilePro
- Mobile Blackspots Map for the UK
- Underutilized Spectrum
- FCC Could Ban Cell Signal Boosters = Bad Idea
- RV Cell Phone Signal Booster
- My Carl Icahn Moment for AT&T & Verizon
- Verizon Has 5X More Lies Than AT&T
- Verizon Femtocell Sells For $249
- J.D. Power Confirms The Sky Is Blue
- Femtocells + Google Location Based Advertising
- Does MagicJack Work?
- AT&T Coverage Map Helmet Video
- Bass Ackwards Cell Phone Coverage Focus
- Vodafone Will Start Advertising Femtocells
- Mt. Baldy is a T-Mobile Dead Zone
- Femtozone at Mobile World Congress 2010
- Cell Phone Hot Spots, WiFi + SIM = SIMFi
- Google Fiber Network Improves Cell Coverage
- Pandora Radio Inverse Cell Coverage Maps
- New Cell Phone Towers Are Not The Answer
- NextG & ExteNet Are Great IPO Candidates
- Drop Spot™ User Generated Carrier Coverage Map
- Identifying Dropped Call Locations
- Femtocells Direct Response Marketing Industry
- Cell Coverage Hole Detection
- Sleek Car Cell Phone Signal Booster Review
- Cell Phone Signal Booster FCC Certification Standa...
- Which Cell Signal Booster is Best for Verizon
- Weak Home Cell Phone Signals
- AT&T & Verizon Fear Being First To Launch Femtocel...
- Clearwire Now Leasing WiMax Network
- Do Cellular Signal Boosters Really Work?
- How to Identify a Quality Cellular Amplifier
-
►
March
(16)
Topics
Femtocell
(119)
ATaT Wireless Coverage
(66)
T-Mobile Coverage
(60)
Sprint Coverage
(58)
Verizon Wireless Coverage
(58)
How To Improve Cell Coverage
(53)
Coverage Maps
(50)
Microcell
(50)
Dead Zones
(49)
Cell Phone Booster
(46)
Cellular Repeaters
(37)
Comcast
(33)
VoIP
(32)
Rants
(30)
New Cell Towers
(29)
TracFone
(28)
UMA
(28)
SIP
(26)
Wifi
(24)
Cell Phone Towers
(23)
Compare Coverage
(23)
FCC
(23)
Distributed Antenna Systems
(22)
iPhone
(22)
3G Coverage
(20)
e911
(18)
Customer Service
(17)
Time Warner
(17)
Clearwire
(16)
Verizon
(13)
ATT
(12)
Cox
(12)
Cell Tower Zoning
(11)
Retail
(11)
Wimax
(11)
Wilson Electronics
(10)
Bad Patch
(9)
Blackspots
(9)
Drive Testing
(9)
MetroPCS Coverage
(9)
Network Optimization
(9)
Text Messaging
(9)
Net Neutrality
(8)
Blackberry
(7)
CTIA
(7)
batteries
(7)
Google
(6)
Advertising
(5)
Funny
(5)
Dropped Calls
(4)
Magic Jack
(4)
Skype
(4)
Smartphones
(4)
Vodafone
(4)
Wi-Ex
(4)
4G
(3)
Andoid
(3)
Femto Jack
(3)
Google Voice
(3)
Reviews
(3)
Sirius XM Coverage
(3)
Ubiquisys
(3)
marketing
(3)
3GPP
(2)
ATT U-Verse
(2)
Airvana
(2)
Cablevision
(2)
Consumer Reports
(2)
HSPA
(2)
Home Coverage
(2)
IP Access
(2)
Kineto
(2)
LTE
(2)
PicoChip
(2)
Survey
(2)
Wireless Extender
(2)
data
(2)
network operations
(2)
Airwalk
(1)
American Tower
(1)
Bass Ackwards
(1)
CIA
(1)
Carrier IQ
(1)
Charter
(1)
Cisco Systems
(1)
Crown Castle
(1)
Groundhog Technologies
(1)
Hilarious
(1)
J.D. Power
(1)
JD Power
(1)
Laptop
(1)
LetsTalk
(1)
Mesh Networks
(1)
MetroPCS
(1)
Mobile World Congress
(1)
MobilePro
(1)
Nexus One
(1)
Nokia Siemans
(1)
O2
(1)
Pandora
(1)
Percell
(1)
Prepaid Wireless
(1)
RF Engineers
(1)
RadioFrame
(1)
Reverb Networks
(1)
Road Runner
(1)
Rural Coverage
(1)
SBA Comm
(1)
SIMFi
(1)
Signal Jammers
(1)
Sure Signal
(1)
Tatara
(1)
US Cellular
(1)
Vanu
(1)
Verzion Fios
(1)
Video Camera
(1)
Vonage
(1)
Wireless Service
(1)
Wireless Spectrum
(1)
broadband
(1)
ereader
(1)
iPad
(1)
mobile video
(1)
politics
(1)
research
(1)


1 comments:
Walt, Remember Femtocells are designed for a specific set of use cases that benefit the operator and the user. You are trying to position repeaters as an alternative to Femtocells when the two have little in common and can be more complementary than competitive. They address different use cases.
1. Femtocells are marketed to users who ALREADY have a broadband connection in their home. The business model works only because the broadband connection can be used as backhaul to the operators'core network. Femtos are not a loss leader to try and get users to sign up for a broadband connection.
2. The purpose of the Femtocell is, among other things, to improve service coverage and handset battery use/life for a specific household (or a small enterprise)in more densely populated areas where the operator investments can result in some economic ROI benefit. In this targeted user case, an average household of 4-6 simultaneous users is easily accommodated by the Femtocell. The intent is not to let your neighbors take advantage of your Femtocell pricing and packaging bundles that might save you money. They can get their own, or you CAN choose to authorized them or other users outside your home to have access by programming their numbers or EINs to an authentication scheme.
3. One of the value propositions for the operator and the user is that homogenizing all users in a particular household on one operator plan will result in bundling of services that achieve an economy of scale for the operator, who in turn can reduce prices for services in the household.
Post a Comment