Pages

iPhone Call Spam Screening: How to Block Unwanted Calls

iPhone Call Spam Screening: How to Block Robocalls and Junk Texts

If you're overwhelmed by robocalls and spam texts, you're not alone. According to spam analytics firm YouMail, U.S. consumers received an estimated 54.5 billion robocalls in 2024, or about 165 calls per second. Spam texts are just as bad — RoboKiller reports that Americans got 94 billion spam texts last year, a 12% increase from 2023.

Fortunately, Apple’s iPhone spam screening tools and third-party apps can help you regain control over your phone.

Why Spam Calls and Texts Are Surging

  • Scammers are getting smarter. Many spam calls now spoof local area codes or even real business numbers to trick you into answering.

  • Text spam is easier and cheaper. A single scammer can send thousands of phishing texts (aka "smishing") in seconds.

  • Consumer losses are rising. The FCC reports U.S. consumers lost over $10 billion to phone scams in 2023, with the average loss per incident over $800.

Built-in iPhone Features That Block Spam

1. Silence Unknown Callers

This feature, available in iOS 13 and later, automatically silences numbers not in your contacts. Calls go straight to voicemail, helping you avoid unwanted interruptions.

How to enable:

  • Settings > Phone > Silence Unknown Callers > Toggle ON

2. SMS Filtering

In Settings > Messages, toggle Filter Unknown Senders to push texts from unknown numbers into a separate tab — reducing phishing risk.

3. Report Junk

When you receive a suspicious message in iMessage, Apple gives you the option to “Report Junk”. This helps train Apple’s system to detect and block spam more effectively.

Third-Party Call and Text Blocking Apps

iPhones allow third-party apps to block calls and filter messages. These apps maintain live databases of known spam numbers and auto-block suspicious activity.

App Key Features Monthly Cost Spam Text Blocking
Hiya Real-time caller ID, auto-block fraud Free / $2.99
Truecaller Caller ID, community spam reports Free / $4.99
RoboKiller AI-powered call screening, answer bots $4.99
Nomorobo Spam call blocking for VoIP/landline Free trial / $1.99

🔒 Fact: RoboKiller claims to block over 1 billion robocalls and spam texts per month across its users.

To enable a call blocking app:

  • Download the app from the App Store

  • Go to Settings > Phone > Call Blocking & Identification

  • Enable the app from the list

Carrier Tools for Extra Protection

Most major carriers offer free and paid call filtering services that work seamlessly with iPhones:

Carrier Service Free Version Premium Features
AT&T ActiveArmor Threat level alerts, reverse lookup
T-Mobile Scam Shield Number masking, voicemail-to-text
Verizon Call Filter Spam lookup, auto-block high risk

These services can label calls as "Scam Likely", block robocalls outright, and send alerts for high-risk numbers.

Spam Text Trends in 2024

  • Top spam text types: Delivery scams (e.g., “Your package is held”), bank phishing, fake job offers.

  • Peak spam hours: 10 a.m. – 2 p.m. local time.

  • Most spammed area codes: 213 (Los Angeles), 347 (New York), 305 (Miami)

📊 Stat: According to RoboKiller, the average American received 28 spam texts per month in 2024 — nearly one per day.

How to Reduce Spam Long-Term

  • Don’t answer unknown numbers.

  • Never click links in suspicious texts.

  • Register your number at donotcall.gov

  • Use 2FA apps (like Authy) instead of SMS for security.

  • Report spam to 7726 (SPAM) — this works for most U.S. carriers.

Final Thoughts

With spam calls and texts on the rise, iPhone users need to take full advantage of Apple’s built-in tools, carrier protection, and advanced third-party apps. Whether you’re silencing unknown numbers or using a robocall-blocking AI assistant, the right setup can make a big difference.

Say goodbye to scam calls — and take back your phone.

Starlink Internet: User Experiences & Performance Data

Why Starlink Is Revolutionizing Internet Access for Rural and Mobile Users: Real User Stories & Data

Access to reliable, high-speed internet remains a significant challenge for millions of people living in rural, remote, and mobile environments. Traditional internet providers often prioritize urban centers, leaving many with slow DSL, expensive satellite TV internet with high latency, or inconsistent cellular data that struggles with coverage gaps.

Starlink, a satellite internet constellation developed by SpaceX, aims to change that narrative by providing high-speed broadband internet almost anywhere on the planet. Utilizing a network of thousands of low-earth orbit satellites, Starlink dramatically reduces latency compared to traditional geostationary satellites and offers speeds competitive with many wired connections.

The Growing Reach of Starlink: Numbers & Deployment

  • As of early 2025, Starlink operates over 5,000 satellites in orbit, with plans to increase to nearly 42,000 over the next decade.

  • Starlink currently serves more than 1.5 million users worldwide, spanning rural farms, remote communities, RV travelers, and even maritime vessels.

  • Average download speeds globally hover between 100 Mbps to 250 Mbps, with some users regularly reporting speeds over 400 Mbps.

  • Latency, a critical factor for gaming and video calls, typically ranges between 20-50 ms, vastly better than traditional satellite internet providers whose latency often exceeds 600 ms.

Real User Experiences: From Ranches to Road Trips

Reliable Connectivity on Remote Ranches

One rancher from Wyoming reported that before Starlink, they had to rely on slow DSL or expensive cellular hotspots that barely supported basic email. After installing Starlink’s satellite dish and router, they regularly experience 200 Mbps download speeds. This allows them to run 12 security cameras streaming simultaneously, maintain smart irrigation controls, and stream HD videos without buffering. The latency improvement also enables smooth video conferencing with suppliers and family.

Uninterrupted Internet on Long Road Trips

Another user documented driving over 2,300 miles from Texas to Canada in a moving U-Haul truck, relying entirely on the Starlink Roam Mini device. Despite constant movement and varied terrain, they maintained a stable connection throughout the trip, averaging 150-180 Mbps speeds. This contrasts sharply with cellular data plans, which often lose signal in rural highway stretches. The Roam Mini’s portability and ability to maintain connectivity in motion make it a valuable tool for travelers, delivery drivers, and remote workers on the move.

Cost-Effective Connectivity in Campgrounds and Small Towns

Starlink's new Roam Mini plan offers a $50 monthly service fee with no activation cost, providing speeds averaging 100-150 Mbps. This makes it highly competitive compared to cellular hotspots and local satellite providers that often charge more for slower speeds and limited data caps. Users camping in national parks or staying in rural towns report easy streaming, video calls, and even remote work capabilities, which was previously impossible with prior setups.

Comparing Starlink to Traditional Internet Options

Internet Type Avg. Download Speed Avg. Latency (ms) Typical Cost per Month Coverage Challenges
DSL 5-25 Mbps 30-60 $40-$70 Limited in rural areas
Cellular 4G LTE/5G 20-100 Mbps 20-40 $50-$100 Coverage gaps, data caps
Traditional Satellite (e.g., HughesNet) 25-50 Mbps 600+ $70-$150 High latency, weather interference
Starlink 100-400 Mbps 20-50 $50-$110 Expanding global coverage

Data compiled from FCC reports and user speed tests.

Starlink’s Global Impact and Growing Market Share

  • Starlink has seen rapid adoption in underserved markets like rural U.S., Canada, parts of Europe, South America, and even remote islands.

  • Studies show over 20 million Americans still lack access to broadband speeds above 25 Mbps, the FCC's minimum standard, underscoring Starlink’s potential to fill the gap.

  • Starlink’s ability to serve mobile use cases — such as RVs, trucks, and boats — is unique among broadband providers, tapping into a growing “digital nomad” and mobile workforce market estimated at 10 million+ in the U.S. alone.

What Users Appreciate Most

  • Consistent Performance: Starlink’s low-earth orbit satellites significantly reduce latency and increase speed versus older satellite systems.

  • Ease of Setup: Users report relatively straightforward installation with plug-and-play equipment.

  • Portability: Especially with Roam and Roam Mini plans, users enjoy connectivity on the move.

  • Reliability: Many use Starlink as a backup to fiber or cellular, reporting zero downtime during major outages.

Areas for Improvement

While Starlink impresses many, users note some areas that could be better:

  • Customer Support: Response times and technical support options can be limited during high demand.

  • Wi-Fi Management: Users request better app features like guest networks, parental controls, and enhanced router customization.

  • Pricing: Although competitive, the initial hardware cost (dish and router) remains a barrier for some rural households.

Final Thoughts: A New Era for Connectivity

Starlink is not just another internet provider — it represents a paradigm shift in how connectivity is delivered to underserved and mobile populations. By combining cutting-edge satellite technology with a user-friendly approach, it opens doors to economic, educational, and social opportunities previously out of reach.

For rural homeowners, road warriors, and remote workers frustrated by slow, unreliable connections, Starlink is proving time and again that it “just works” when other options fail.

Is Your City Censoring 5G Towers? Why Some Neighborhoods Say No

📡 5G Rollout Meets Resistance: The Hidden Backlash in U.S. Cities

As carriers like Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile race to expand 5G networks across America, a wave of grassroots opposition is slowing or halting installations — especially in suburban and residential areas.

From lawsuits and zoning restrictions to emergency moratoriums, more cities and communities are pushing back. Why? Concerns range from property values and aesthetics to health fears and transparency issues.

2024 Pew Research survey findings:

  • 37% of Americans express concern about 5G health impacts.
  • 61% don’t trust cities to notify them about new tower installations.
  • Only 22% support 5G small cells in residential neighborhoods.

🏘️ Why Residents Are Saying "No" to 5G Towers

1. Visual Clutter & Property Devaluation

5G uses "small cells" — compact antennas on streetlights, utility poles, and even new standalone towers, often just 10–50 feet from homes.

🗣️ “They installed a metal pole outside my window with no notice. My property lost value instantly.”
— Resident in Dallas, TX

2022 University of Colorado Study:

  • Homes within 500 feet of a 5G pole sold for 2–7% less.
  • These homes spent 13% longer on the market.

National Institute for Science, Law and Public Policy:

  • 94% of buyers would not purchase a home near a 5G tower.
  • 79% of realtors say it negatively impacts value.

2. Health Concerns — Real or Not, They Persist

  • More than 250 municipalities passed resolutions urging caution or demanding more research.
  • 25+ lawsuits have been filed nationwide to stop or delay towers.

2020 NIH meta-review: “Evidence is inconclusive on long-term millimeter wave exposure in high-density areas.”

3. No Community Input, Fast-Tracked Approvals

FCC Small Cell Order (2018):

  • Permits must be approved in 60 days or less.
  • If no action, installation proceeds by default.
  • Many cities caught off guard.

2023 OpenSignal Report:
74% of small cells in California and Florida were installed without public notice.

🗺️ Where 5G Is Being Delayed, Fought, or Banned

City Population Action Taken Status
Mill Valley, CA14,000Emergency ban on 5G in residential zonesIn effect since 2018
Petaluma, CA60,0001,500-ft setback required near homes/schoolsEnforced
Easton, CT7,6005G moratorium citing health risksActive
Montgomery County, MD1.1 million30-ft setback for small cellsEnforced
Keene, NH23,000Delayed Verizon tower approval 6+ monthsTower approved
Flower Hill, NY4,800Sued to stop 66 small cell nodesSettlement pending
Burlington, MA26,000Court case against tower near homesIn litigation

🏠 How Much Do 5G Towers Hurt Home Values?

By Distance from 5G Tower:

Distance Estimated Value Impact
0–50 feet−7% to −10%
50–150 feet−3% to −6%
150–500 feet−1% to −3%
Over 500 feetMinimal/neutral

Source: Appraisal Research Partners, University of Colorado Boulder

In Flower Hill, NY, residents documented $30K–$100K in potential home value losses from proposed 5G nodes. Similar lawsuits in Maryland and Massachusetts referenced comparable declines.

📢 “A buyer sees a 5G pole and thinks cancer, noise, or tech clutter. That’s a huge red flag in high-end markets.”
— Julie Klein, Greater LA Realtors Association

⚖️ Federal Limits on Local Control

Federal law restricts how much cities can interfere:

  • 1996 Telecommunications Act bars health-based denial of towers.
  • Cities may set limits on height, design, or proximity to schools/homes.
  • Lawsuits may result if delays are too long or overly restrictive.

🔧 What Are the Alternatives?

Cities are exploring compromises:

  • Use of existing poles to minimize clutter
  • Setback rules from residential zones and schools
  • Mandated public notices and approval hearings
  • Adopting “stealth” designs that conceal antennas
💡 Boulder, CO convinced Verizon to reduce pole height and co-locate on existing infrastructure.

📬 Report a 5G Tower or Dispute in Your Area

Deadcellzones.com is building a national map of:

  • Controversial 5G tower locations
  • Lawsuits, moratoriums, and zoning disputes
  • Photos and reports submitted by residents

👉 Submit a report from your city or neighborhood.