Organizing an event with no stable internet is a risk no event planner takes lightly. Whether it is a seminar, an expo, or a charity gala with live streaming, connectivity is as elemental as electricity today. That is why there is bonded cellular internet rental—a practical solution for keeping attendees, exhibitors, and workers online without depending upon venue networks which are bound to fail when stretched.
What is Bonded Cellular Internet?
Remote work, streaming, gaming, and online schooling have made reliable internet a daily necessity. Yet in 2025, many neighborhoods across the U.S. still suffer from poor Wi-Fi performance, frequent outages, or no broadband access at all. These "internet dead zones" aren’t just in rural areas—they exist in urban apartment complexes, growing suburbs, and even tech-centric cities. This report highlights the worst places for internet connectivity in America and explains why these digital deserts persist.
Based on FCC data, Reddit complaints, speed test results, and user-submitted experiences:
Venice Beach, CA
Beautiful coastline, but aging infrastructure. Residents report frequent outages and inconsistent speeds from Xfinity and AT&T.
Flatbush, Brooklyn, NY
Many buildings lack access to Verizon Fios, leaving residents with slow DSL or expensive, unreliable options.
Hyde Park, Chicago, IL
Despite proximity to major universities, internet infrastructure lags. Spectrum and AT&T users report repeated slowdowns.
Oakland Hills, CA
Hilly terrain and limited fiber coverage make internet access spotty. Frontier customers suffer frequent dropouts.
East Austin, TX
Fast-growing area with demand outpacing infrastructure. Many zones lack fiber and suffer from congestion.
East Cleveland, OH
Residents are often stuck with legacy DSL. Few providers offer high-speed upgrades.
South San Antonio, TX
Limited provider options and low competition lead to poor service reliability.
South Bronx, NY
Spotty Fios deployment and lack of ISP investment hinder connectivity.
Detroit's West Side, MI
Redlining of services persists—many areas underserved or forgotten by ISPs.
Kaneohe, HI
Island geography and older networks leave many users with limited speeds and frequent service disruptions.
Lack of Fiber Investment: ISPs often avoid upgrading areas seen as low-profit, including low-income neighborhoods and complex multi-dwelling units.
Outdated Infrastructure: Many buildings and regions still rely on DSL or coaxial cables that can't handle modern bandwidth demands.
ISP Monopolies: Without competition, ISPs lack incentive to improve service or pricing.
Geographic Barriers: Hills, dense tree coverage, and high-rise buildings interfere with signal quality and delay infrastructure rollouts.
"I'm paying for 800 Mbps and getting 50." — Glendale, AZ. Frequent complaints in high-density housing, older buildings, and areas without fiber.
"AT&T still hasn't upgraded my neighborhood from 10 Mbps DSL." — Suburban Atlanta. Some areas stuck with legacy copper lines, especially in Southern states.
Users in Florida and Texas report daily outages and unreliable speeds during peak hours. Infrastructure struggles to keep up with suburban growth.
Limited fiber rollouts leave users dependent on outdated DSL. Complaints rise in California and parts of the Northeast.
Upgrade Equipment: Use a Wi-Fi 6 or 6E router.
Install a Mesh Network: Great for large homes or multi-story buildings.
Switch ISPs: If multiple are available, compare them by performance—not just price.
Talk to Your Landlord: Landlords can negotiate bulk fiber deals with providers.
Know a neighborhood where internet is terrible? Help others by submitting your ZIP code, provider, and details about the issue. The Deadzones.com interactive map will grow from your reports, shining light on the most neglected areas in America.
Stay tuned for monthly updates and expanded reports, including city-by-city breakdowns of the worst internet in the U.S.
Customers of major U.S. carriers, including T-Mobile, AT&T, and Verizon, have recently reported unexpected charges for WhatsApp international calls, raising concerns and questions about the practice. While WhatsApp typically uses internet data to make calls, some users are seeing these calls treated as standard international calls, with charges of $50 or more for a single call — a practice some describe as a scam. This can occur if the call is inadvertently routed through a cellular network rather than strictly over Wi-Fi or mobile data.
VoIP Calls Misclassified as Cellular Calls: In some cases, WhatsApp calls may be interpreted as regular phone calls if the network connection is unstable or if the call switches to a cellular network.
Data Roaming and International Charges: If a WhatsApp call is made while roaming internationally, carriers may apply data roaming charges, which can add up quickly.
Network Switching: When moving between Wi-Fi and cellular networks during a call, the call may register as a standard international call.
Use Wi-Fi Exclusively: Ensure you are connected to a reliable Wi-Fi network before making a call.
Disable Cellular Data for WhatsApp: In your phone’s settings, restrict WhatsApp to Wi-Fi only.
Check Your Billing Statement: Review your carrier's bill for any unexpected charges and contact customer service if needed.
Contact your carrier’s customer support to clarify the charges.
Request a refund or adjustment if the call was mistakenly billed as an international call.
Monitor future usage to ensure calls are properly routed through data-only connections.
If you believe you were unfairly charged or misled about WhatsApp international call charges, you can file a complaint with the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) or the FTC (Federal Trade Commission). Both agencies handle consumer complaints related to telecommunications and deceptive business practices. Document the charges, keep records of communications with your carrier, and include all relevant details when submitting a complaint.
Understanding why major U.S. carriers charge for WhatsApp international calls can help users avoid unnecessary fees and stay connected without unexpected costs.
As WiFi becomes more essential to modern homes, many people wonder how far a WiFi router should be from their sleeping area for safety and comfort. While research on WiFi radiation and health effects is still evolving, keeping a safe distance between your WiFi router and where you sleep can help reduce exposure to radiofrequency (RF) radiation and potentially improve sleep quality.
In this article, we’ll cover the recommended distance for placing a WiFi router near your bed, explore safety considerations, and provide tips for limiting exposure to WiFi signals overnight.
In the dynamic world of internet connectivity, cable companies are spearheading a revolutionary shift towards mesh networks, exemplified by devices like ERO. But what drives this departure from traditional repeaters and routers, and how do mesh networks redefine the connectivity game in terms of speed and coverage distance? Let’s explore these questions to unravel the rationale behind this strategic transition.
In the ever-evolving realm of satellite technology, where every advancement inches humanity closer to a seamlessly connected world, Astranis emerges as a pioneering force, reshaping the dynamics of satellite deployment. While companies like Starlink have made significant strides in providing global internet coverage through constellations of small satellites in Low Earth Orbit (LEO), Astranis is charting a different course by placing its satellites at Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO), approximately 100 times farther away. This strategic positioning brings forth a myriad of benefits, fundamentally altering the landscape of satellite coverage and connectivity.
Geostationary Earth Orbit, situated approximately 35,786 kilometers above the Earth's equator, holds a unique advantage:
With internet access more essential than ever, free WiFi hotspots provide an invaluable service for staying connected on the go. In the U.S., WiFi hotspots can be found everywhere, from coffee shops and libraries to shopping malls and public parks. But what percentage of these hotspots are free to use? This article dives into the availability of free WiFi in the U.S., top providers, and the impact of free hotspots on communities.
According to recent reports, approximately 60% of U.S. WiFi hotspots offer free access, though this percentage can vary depending on the location and provider. Many businesses, public institutions, and cities offer free WiFi to improve accessibility and keep people connected.
Free WiFi hotspots are available in a variety of settings. Here are some of the most common places to find them:
Some companies and organizations stand out as leading providers of free WiFi access. These include:
Free WiFi hotspots aren’t just about convenience; they play a significant role in public welfare and accessibility. Here’s how:
The U.S. is likely to see a continued expansion of free WiFi, driven by both public and private initiatives:
With roughly 60% of WiFi hotspots in the U.S. being free, Americans have widespread access to the internet in a variety of public and private spaces. From libraries and parks to cafes and stores, free WiFi hotspots provide vital connectivity for millions of people every day. As cities and companies continue to invest in expanding free WiFi networks, we can expect even greater internet accessibility, helping bridge the digital divide and offering more convenience to everyone.
In the fast-paced digital era, connectivity is essential. WiFi hotspots and cell towers are two prominent solutions, each with unique economic implications for service providers and users. While WiFi hotspots offer local, high-speed access in targeted areas, cell towers provide extensive, wide-range mobile coverage. So which is more cost-effective for large-scale connectivity? In this article, we dive into the economics of WiFi hotspots and cell towers to explore their costs, benefits, and strategic advantages.
WiFi hotspots provide wireless internet in specific locations. Often seen in cafes, parks, and airports, WiFi hotspots are typically connected to a high-speed internet source and broadcast a localized signal to connect devices within a limited radius. Hotspots are often used to deliver internet access in public spaces or support dense networks indoors.
Cell towers are large structures that enable mobile network coverage over expansive areas by sending and receiving radio signals to mobile devices. Unlike WiFi hotspots, cell towers support broader range and mobility, providing connectivity for people on the move across cities, highways, and rural areas.
The costs associated with WiFi hotspots and cell towers vary significantly due to differences in technology, infrastructure requirements, and range of coverage. Here’s a closer look at each:
In densely populated urban areas, WiFi hotspots are often more practical, delivering fast, reliable connections in high-traffic zones. Cell towers also play a role but may face capacity issues in crowded spaces, where WiFi hotspots can alleviate network strain by handling data-heavy tasks.
Cell towers are more economical for rural connectivity due to their wide coverage range, reducing the need for multiple installations across sparse areas. WiFi hotspots can still serve as complementary options for localized needs, like community centers or rural libraries.
Airports, stadiums, and universities often benefit from WiFi hotspots due to the high data demand in a concentrated area. Hotspots allow these spaces to provide high-speed internet without overloading mobile networks.
With advancements in 5G and WiFi 6, the boundary between WiFi and cellular networks is blurring. Both WiFi and cellular technologies are set to become faster, more reliable, and more capable of handling large amounts of data, allowing for more strategic blending of the two.
The cost-effectiveness of WiFi hotspots versus cell towers depends largely on the type of coverage needed:
In the future, both technologies will continue to play essential roles in connectivity, with WiFi excelling in specific high-traffic areas and cell towers delivering consistent coverage for on-the-go connectivity.
As mobile internet usage continues to rise, China Mobile is at the forefront of providing connectivity solutions through free WiFi hotspots across the country. These hotspots play a crucial role in enhancing access to the internet, particularly in urban areas, public spaces, and transportation hubs. In this article, we’ll explore the availability, benefits, and impact of China Mobile’s free WiFi hotspots on users and the broader community.
China Mobile, one of the largest telecommunications companies in the world, has established an extensive network of free WiFi hotspots throughout China. These hotspots are strategically placed in various locations, including:
Accessing China Mobile’s free WiFi hotspots is simple and user-friendly. Here’s how to get connected:
The introduction of free WiFi hotspots by China Mobile offers several advantages:
China Mobile’s free WiFi hotspots are part of a broader initiative to enhance urban infrastructure and digital connectivity. The benefits include:
China Mobile’s free WiFi hotspots play a vital role in enhancing connectivity across the country, making the internet accessible to millions of users. By providing free access in strategic locations, China Mobile supports local businesses, fosters community engagement, and contributes to the development of smart cities. As mobile internet usage continues to grow, initiatives like these are essential for ensuring that everyone can stay connected in an increasingly digital world.
In our hyper-connected world, a stable and fast WiFi connection is essential for seamless communication, work, and entertainment. However, many of us have experienced frustrating dead zones and weak signals within our homes or offices. To tackle this issue, WiFi boosters have become popular solutions to extend and amplify the reach of our wireless networks. But do these boosters truly work? In this article, we will explore the efficacy of WiFi boosters, debunk common myths, and shed light on the truth behind their functionality.
 |
Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) has been a trailblazer in the tech world for decades, with the iPhone being one of its most iconic and profitable products. However, back in 2011, Apple’s stock took a significant hit after the company lost its iPhone exclusivity with AT&T in the United States. Until then, AT&T had been the sole U.S. carrier offering the iPhone, but Apple’s decision to expand iPhone availability to other carriers marked a major change. So, what caused Apple’s stock to get “crushed” with this shift? Let’s take a look at the key factors that led to this market reaction and how they affected Apple’s stock performance.
When Apple lost iPhone exclusivity, the news caught the market’s attention, raising concerns among investors and analysts alike. At the time, AT&T’s exclusivity on the iPhone was considered a significant advantage, as it created a sense of prestige and scarcity around Apple’s flagship product. By ending exclusivity and partnering with Verizon in 2011, Apple was signaling a change in strategy, but not all investors were convinced it would be a positive move.
Initially, Apple’s stock saw a pullback, as markets adjusted to the new reality of a non-exclusive iPhone. The drop in AAPL was largely driven by short-term concerns about the impact on Apple’s profitability. However, this response highlighted a fundamental fear: that an expansion strategy could hinder Apple’s historically tight control over the brand.
With the iPhone now available on multiple carriers, customers suddenly had more flexibility to choose their preferred networks, including Verizon. This shift intensified competition, not only among U.S. carriers but also within Apple’s product lineup. Other smartphone makers, such as Samsung and Google, had begun gaining traction in the market, adding further pressure to Apple’s sales forecasts.
While Apple’s stock may have been impacted initially, the long-term effects of ending exclusivity turned out to be highly beneficial for the company. Expanding carrier options meant a broader reach for the iPhone, ultimately driving significant growth in sales volume. As it turns out, the move allowed Apple to solidify its place in the U.S. smartphone market, as well as expand its international presence by forming similar agreements worldwide.
Although Apple’s decision to end iPhone exclusivity with AT&T led to a temporary drop in AAPL stock, it ultimately proved to be a strategic success that fueled the company’s long-term growth. The initial stock reaction reflected investor concerns around brand exclusivity, potential profit margin impacts, and heightened competition. However, by broadening access to the iPhone, Apple laid the groundwork for an expanded customer base and sustained growth.
Today, Apple’s choice to end exclusivity stands as a pivotal moment in its history, underscoring the company’s ability to adapt and innovate in a highly competitive market. And while AAPL experienced volatility in the short term, Apple’s strategy solidified its dominance in the smartphone industry—making it a lasting success in the tech giant’s evolution.
