Showing posts with label Clearwire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Clearwire. Show all posts

Wireless Spectrum Shortage Exaggeration


Why the spectrum shortage exaggeration?  AT&T is simply trying to block competition and thus making your service worse in the long run.  The "spectrum crisis" has been hugely exaggerated for political purposes.  Spending billions of dollars to have the right to use airwaves or licensing wireless spectrum, is essential to phone companies and its a huge government revenue generator despite very few people understanding it.  Most spectrum today is unlicensed such as WiFi but the licensed spectrum is often hoarded to fend off competition.  For example, AT&T has gone to great lengths to add capacity to its congestion 3G network in such cities as New York and San Francisco not by tapping its unused spectrum, but by upgrading its cell tower and networking equipment and backhaul.   If AT&T's data network is overloaded in an area, the traffic doesn't move over to T-Mobile's network if there is spare capacity at the tower. But that would happen after the two companies combine, resulting in better utilization but likely even more network congestion for both AT&T and T-Mobile customers.

More spectrum available means more simultaneous phone calls and more data can be carried in the same area.  According to the experts AT&T already has an ample supply of unused wireless spectrum that it plans to use to expand its network over the next several years. And much of T-Mobile's 3G spectrum is already in use, so the acquisition won't result in fresh airwaves becoming available for AT&T customers.

AT&T has reasons besides spectrum hoarding to pay $39 billion for T-Mobile.  It lost the iPhone exclusivity and wants to persuade T-Mobile's customers to switch to smartphones, which carry higher monthly fees and data plan. That's an argument that appeals to Wall Street investors, but not to regulators at the FCC or the Department of Justice who are reviewing the merger.  All the more reasons why we think the Obama Administration will block the merger in order to persuade the industry to have 3 large competitors and encourage vertical integration not horizontal.   

Clearwire CEO T-Mobile Founder Objects to AT&T Merger


Former Voicestream Wireless (T-Mobile USA) founder and now Clearwire's new CEO John Stanton the "Wireless Wiz Kid" in an interview on CNBC voiced his objection to the proposed AT&T buyout of T-Mobile. AT&T's device exclusivity was already a problem with AT&T, such as its recently ended iPhone exclusive. The concentration of buying power would only get worse if the carrier had that much more clout and 130M, customers. John Stanton does not approve of the merger between T-Mobile and AT&T and yet he struggles with his view because he doesn't want the US Government to get involved but thinks it has to.

Why Did AT&T Oppose the Sprint, Clearwire Merger in 2008?


Do you remember back in 2008 when Sprint and Clearwire announced intentions to merge?  Can you guess who apposed it?  Yep AT&T read the articles below.  Well now that the tables are turned on them and Sprint's Dan Hesse has plans to appeal to congress to halt the AT&T-T-Mobile Deal.  The combined entity would have “tremendous” power and AT&T and Verizon Wireless would hold 79% of the U.S. market if regulators approve the deal.  Sprint will file its concerns to Congress during the review.  The U.S. House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearings on the takeover. House Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas, vowed to hold a hearing, saying in a statement that "Congress must take a close look at the plan to ensure that the proposed merger promotes a healthy and competitive telecommunications market." The committee will look into possible anticompetitive impacts, said Representative Lamar Smith (Twitter), a Texas Republican who heads the panel.

AT&T Looks to Block Sprint/Clearwire Merger
AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) is accusing the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) of playing favorites. The telco filed a complaint to the agency yesterday saying that Sprint Nextel Corp. (NYSE: S) and Clearwire LLC (Nasdaq: CLWR)'s proposed merger of assets should be subject to the same scrutiny it was given when it acquired Dobson Communications Corp. (Nasdaq: DCEL) last year. (See AT&T to Buy Dobson for $5.1B.)

AT&T opposes Sprint, Clearwire  AT&T Inc., which has the largest wireless subscriber base in the country, is asking the Federal Communications Commission to deny a merger request from Sprint Nextel Corp. and Clearwire Corp. AT&T claims it is all for competition and that it isn't against the principles of the Sprint/Clearwire merger. It says it's merely asking that the FCC show some consistency in the way it combs over the deal.

Related Stories: 

US Wireless Subscribers Pie Chart Post AT&T & T-Mobile Merger

This is what the US wireless subscriber market will look like post an AT&T and T-Mobile merger.  Does this look like a pie chart that is promoting fair competition?  Is it fair that these two companies are the highest paying dividend stocks (5% annual) on Wall Street?   shareholder payout is approximately $10 billion dollars per year and the Verizon dividend is approximately $5 billion dollars per year.  Are our FCC and DOJ protecting us from the competition when the US is far behind the rest of the World with data speeds and connectivity?

If AT&T controls 130M customers and Verizon 102 million this will wipe out any ability for competition.  Sprint is already in trouble with its financial problems and will never be a formidable competitor. T-Mobile was actually starting to do some disruptive things to the largest two carriers Verizon and AT&T before the acquisition took place.  The technology disruption in using WiFi, 4G, and HSPA+ alone was enough to get AT&T to swoop in a buy the company to shut them up.   This chart alone should concern the Department of Justice when considering if there is fair competition in an already corrupt industry.  I will go on record to say that this merger will be the worst in US history for customers and competition if it goes through.  

Where is 4G Available Maps

T-Mobile 4G HSPA+ in 100 Markets in U.S.

Sprint / Clearwire 4G Wimax Network for 4G Phones & Data Cards

Verizon 4G LTE Cities in Yellow Dots 3G in Red 

MetroPCS LTE Map for Phones


How Each Carrier Defines 4G


4G is as confusing as ever to the average consumer.  Verizon and MetroPCS are launching their 4G LTE network and three out of the four major US carrier Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile promote the fastest 4G data networks.  However, each company defines 4G differently and none of them meet International Telecommunication Union standards. The ITU defines 4G as a connection capable of 100 mbps to 1 gbps. The cellular data network's 4G speeds don't even come close to this and the only marketing thing each carrier seems to agree upon is that 4G is just what comes after 3G. While the title of 4G isn't accurate by International Standards is meaningless the carriers now have created a new step of planned obsolescence.  Here is an article from Life Hacker which will try to simply each offering.  Read More.

Verizon 4G LTE Will Not Work on Macs

Verizon LTE is only for PCs and NOT Macs
Sadly Apple Macs will not be able to use the new Verizon 4G LTE network anytime soon.  Devices available are currently built for PCs and require purchasing a $100 LG and Pantech 4G LTE modem.  Verizon’s LTE USB modem devices will only compatible with Windows XP, Vista or Windows 7.  See the latest 4G LTE Verizon data plans but we wonder how many people will be willing to spend $600-$1000 per year for 5-12 mbps.

Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint, MetroPCS 4G Pricing Compared

4G is getting a bit out of hand with regards to misleading 4G marketing claims and speeds.  Sprint is using Wimax, T-Mobile & AT&T are using HSPA+, Verizon and MetroPCS are both using LTE.  AT&T is not charted above because they refuse to say how fast their network will be.  Here is another chart comparing 4G & 3G network speeds.  Every carrier but T-Mobile seems to have data pricing wrong and don't realize that their customers are increasingly using Wifi for data offload and this is free.

Clearwire Hidden Data Cap & Early Termination Fees Class Action Investigation

Clearwire Corporation (NASDAQ: CLWR) Misleading Advertising Investigation

Does your wireless internet service seem slower than it should be? Do you have difficulty streaming movies or downloading large files pm up data card or Clearwire device?  Are you not getting coverage where you were promised?

Milberg LLP is investigating Clearwire Corporation, a provider of wireless internet services. Clearwire promises consumers “unlimited, high speed” internet. Milberg is investigating the possibility that contrary to these promises, Clearwire imposes a hidden “cap” on usage and once users exceed that cap, Clearwire deliberately slows their internet speeds, depriving users of the high-speed internet access for which they paid. Making matters worse, Clearwire imposes an early termination fee, so users who have been “capped” cannot cancel their service without paying an additional fee. If you believe that your internet speed has been reduced by Clearwire and you wish to talk to a lawyer from Milberg LLP about this, at no obligation to you, please complete the form.

Milberg LLP has been representing consumers and investors for more than four decades and serves as lead counsel in federal and state courts throughout the United States. Please visit the Milberg website for more information about the firm. If you wish to discuss this matter with us or have any questions concerning your rights and interests with regard to this matter, please contact the following attorney:

How to Get a Free Sprint 3G Femtocell

Sprint Airave 3G EV-DO Femtocell

Sprint will apparently begin offering FREE femtocells for its "qualified customers" that have reception problems on their 3G / EV-DO phones. Sprint's new Airave femtocell now supports 3G which technically should be 3X faster (500-700 kbps kilobytes per second ) than their 2G Samsung femtocell of 150 (kbps).  The updated Airave Access Point (aka what is a femtocell?) uses a customer's broadband internet connection to route calls back to the Sprint network and is being marketed by Sprint as a mini cell tower. It covers up to 5,000 square feet and supports up to six calls simultaneously.  The Airave will be available in stores to customers with specific in-building reception issues.

Sprint 2G Airave femtocell has been around for almost 3 years since 2007 and sells for $100.  For some reason that makes no business sense, Sprint will still continue to offering its' 2G data version of Airave for $99.99, plus a required $4.99/month plus an activation fee of $10 for a single line or $20 multi-line plans.  We don't have a clue why they would continue charging for a old product other than possibly trying to avoid cannibalizing their existing customers.

Sprint is riding the data wave that AT&T creating launched their AT&T femtocell earlier this year.  Sprint seems to be doing it right and offering the device for free which is how it should be.  We are not quite sure what criteria will get you the "qualified customer" status yet but here are some ideas below that might help get you a free femtocell:
  1. Find out if the Sprint 3G femtocell is available in your market.
  2. Use Sprint Dead Zones Map map to share reception problems in your neighborhood (see map below)
  3. Complain a lot to Sprint customer service that your home reception is poor
  4. Document your dropped calls on a daily basis using your monthly bill
  5. Show Sprint that you have been a customer for many years
  6. Show Sprint that you have multiple Sprint phones in the house
  7. Show Sprint that you have multiple subscribers in the house
  8. Show Sprint that you are a Clearwire customer
  9. Become friendly with your local Sprint store sales manager
  10. Find out when your contract expires and use renewal as leverage
If you know of any other factors that could help influence Sprint to give you a free femtocell please submit in the comments below or email us. See our map below to build your case to the carrier and use the map to show problems in your area.


What Does 1G 2G 2.5G 3G 3.5G 4G 5G Mean?


With the announcement of the new iPhone 4 there is a lot of confusion about what is 3G and 4G.  Here is a great video which explains the evolution of the technology and what AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile and Sprint use on their networks.  The first iPhone 3G used a technology called EGDE and the new iPhone 4 is using the the HSPA technology.  Here are the protocols explained so that when someone says they have a 4G iPhone you can correct them.

Generation - Definition - Technologies - Speeds
1G - Original analog cellular for voice (AMPS, NMT, TACS) 14.4 kbps
2G - Digital narrowband circuit data  (TDMA, CDMA) 9-14.4 kbps
2.5G - Packet data onto a 2G network (GPRS, EDGE) 20-40 kpbs
3G - Digital broadband packet data (CDMA, EV-DO, UMTS, EDGE) 500-700 kbps
3.5G - Replacement for EDGE is (HSPA) 1-3 mbps
4G - Digital broadband packet data all IP (Wi-Fi, WIMAX, LTE) 3-5 mbps
5G - Gigabit per second in a few years (?) 1+ gbps

Customer Churn: Coverage vs.Contracts

Contracts Reduce Customer Churn . . . Not Service

It has become fairly obvious that if AT&T's lost its' current iPhone or iPad exclusivity contract that they would suffer tremendous customer carnage.  Every person I speak with tells me that if AT&T didn't have them locked into a Blackberry or iPhone contract they would switch to another smaller carrier.  Unlike, Europe where you can purchase a phone 1st and pick a wireless carrier 2nd.  US customers are only offered subsidized phones that lock them into exclusive carrier contracts.  It's bogus in my opinion and should get more government regulation by the FCC who continues to be a pussy on this topic. 

Clearwire Adds "Honest" Coverage Maps

Kudos to Clearwire who has taken the “coverages map battle" to a whole new level, in a way that potential wireless users might find more useful than anything offered by Verizon or AT&T.   Their coverage maps use anecdotal network data signals from testing to show actual expected performance on a block-by-block level.  View the new maps at Clear.com/imap, which combine RF engineering network-performance graphs on top of a Google Map, allowing you to see a more detailed map of WiMAX deployments in each of its live markets.

It will be interesting to see how Clearwire customers users begin to add locations to our map of 4gdeadzones.com. Not all dead zones are treated equally and eventually 4G and LTE coverage maps will have to be audited for their claims as well. Maybe Clearwire would be open to being the first company to view user-generated maps as a customer-friendly service similar to financial auditing services Deloitte or PricewaterhouseCoopers.  It won't be long before major retailers Amazon, Best Buy Mobile and Radio Shack get into the coverage map business and will force carriers to be more transparent about their coverage.  Auditing is one of the best ways to accomplish this.

Femtocell Companies Funded In 2008

The femtocell market has seen a few large investments in recent months, showing that the industry has strong market potential and there are lots of home and commercial dead zones to fix. Prominent players (e.g. Airvana, Ticker: AIRV IPO in July of 2007 for $60M, picoChip $27M, Ubiquisys ($25M) were funded in 2007, the emerging industry appears to be reasonably well capitalized for the turbulent times ahead and growth. Investors are hoping for more commercial deployments of femtocells during the next 12 months, setting the stage for mass market deployments during 2010. Here are a few companies that were successful at raising money in 2008.

October 2008 - Kineto Wireless $15.5M, which includes substantial amounts from NEC and Motorola.

September 2008 - Percello raised $12M to fund development of their femtocell chipset, bringing to $18M the total investment raised.

August 2008 - RadioFrame raised $26M to expand their picocell and femtocell range, bringing investment up to $100M since 2001.

May 2008 - Qualcomm and other venture capitalists invested an undisclosed amount in ip.access

January 2008 - Airwalk received $10M

Updated list from 3G in Home Blog
  • Airvana: IPO
  • AirWalk: $10 m
  • ip.access: strategic investment from ADC, Cisco, Qualcomm
  • Kineto: $15.5 million round including Motorola & strategic investment from NEC
  • Percello: $12 million
  • picoChip: strategic investment from Samsung
  • RadioFrame: $28 million
  • Tatara: $6.5 million
  • Vanu: $32 million
  • Ubiquisys: $25 million round including VC money and Google as a strategic investor; further strategic investment from T-Ventures.
DeadCellZones.com sits in a unique position based on our brand recognition and utility to educate the market about femtocell technology as control of in-building-coverage is suddenly in the hands of consumers and not carriers any longer. The masses are still not very familiar with the technology but its starting to trickle down to early adopters and we hope to provide a source of information for these companies where the coverage pain exists.

WiMAX Operators Fined For Poor Coverage

WiMAX operators fined for failure to reach the coverage target of 25% the population by March of 2009 stipulated by their concessions.

Three of Malaysia's WiMAX operators have been hit with fines relating to failures in rolling out their networks on time, the Star Online reports.   

Tan Sri Francis Yeoh, head of the YTL Group, which owns Y-Max, saying: ‘We believe in having an extensive network up and running as we don’t see the point in having incremental coverage. We take this business seriously. We will have 60% coverage (more than the needed 40%) by the next deadline.’ Additionally, unnamed sources at one of the operators claimed that the delays in achieving the coverage target stemmed from a number of issues including long waits for approval to install the base stations. REDtone meanwhile blamed technical issues with its spectrum allocation for its delays. According to reports, the country’s telecoms watchdog, the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC), advised REDtone, Asiaspace, and Y-Max Networks that they had failed to reach the 25% population coverage stipulated by their concessions by March 2009. The three operators all face differing levels of financial penalty, with Y-Max looking at an MYR1.9 million (USD559,000) penalty, while Asiaspace and REDtone will be required to pay MYR1.7 million and MYR200,000 respectively.


We promise to provide you coverage just look at our maps.  Where have we heard this story before?  I guess its much easier to audit coverage in a smaller country like Malaysia than the U.S.  Good to see some accountability coming to the telecom industry which notoriously over-promises and under-delivers.  If the FCC wanted to enforce rules it also could become a profit center of fines itself.  All they have to do is levy a fine against the carriers for over-promising coverage and the  Deadcellzones.com community of users can assist in the audit. 

Popular Posts